ȸ¿ø°¡ÀÔ | ¿¬¶ôó | »çÀÌÆ®¸Ê | English

      È¸»ç¼Ò°³ | ¸®Æ÷Æ® | Ä¿½ºÅÒ ¸®¼­Ä¡ | °í°´Áö¿ø


·Î±×ÀÎ

Ä«Å×°í¸®

À¯/¹«¼±Åë½Å

Àü±â/ÀüÀÚ

µðÁöÅбâ±â/¹Ìµð¾î/¹æ¼Û

Information Technology

¿¡³ÊÁö

»ý¸í°øÇÐ

È­ÇÐ/½Å¼ÒÀç

ÀÚµ¿Â÷

ȯ°æ

ÀϹݼҺñÀç

¸¶ÄÉÆÃ/±¤°í

±ÝÀ¶

°Ç¼³

±³Åë/¿î¼Û

¼ÒºñÀÚÁ¶»ç

¹æÀ§/Ç×°ø/¿ìÁÖ

½ÄÀ½·á

Áß°ø¾÷

±³À°

±â°è

¹«¿ª

½ºÆ÷Ã÷/·¹Àú

ÇØ¿î/Á¶¼±

ÆмÇ

Á¤ºÎ/Á¤Ã¥

°ø¿¹/±Í±Ý¼Ó

ÄÄÆÛ´Ï ÇÁ·ÎÆÄÀÏ

±âŸ»ê¾÷

 
ÇöÀçÀ§Ä¡ : HOME > ¸®Æ÷Æ® > ¿¡³ÊÁö > ±âŸ
The Impact of Carbon Regulation on Power Generation
¹ßÇà»ç Datamonitor

¹ßÇàÀÏ 2008-12
ºÐ·® 15 pages
¼­ºñ½ºÇüÅ Report
ÆǸŰ¡°Ý

ÀμâÇϱâ

Table of Contents

  • DATAMONITOR VIEW
    • CATALYST
    • SUMMARY
  • ANALYSIS
    • The current and likely future dynamics shaping the interrelationship between gas, oil, coal and carbon suggest that carbon prices will rise long term
      • The prices of gas and carbon are exhibiting increased positive correlation trends, destabilized mostly by the seasonality of gas
      • Oil is acting as a positively correlated non-seasonal gas proxy for carbon prices
      • In the long term, carbon prices and energy prices are likely to increase
      • Going forward, three likely scenarios will dictate the future correlation between fossil fuel prices and carbon prices
    • Utilities are unlikely to decommission viable power plants unless the variable costs of continued operation exceed revenues
      • Commercial breakeven without carbon pricing or incentives is caused by an inflexion in energy use, not fossil fuel switch-off
      • The rapid scaling of ' green' energy sources will impact the commercial breakeven of all power generation technologies
      • Carbon policies and peak oil dynamics are designed to steepen the fossil fuels supply curve, making clean energy more attractive
      • To date, European utilities have gained more than they have ' pained' from European carbon regulation
      • Power generators have three means of switching to less polluting thermal generation to hedge against the carbon externality
      • An incumbent power utility' s decision to switch is generally made on the basis of different decision rules
      • At current prices, a technological switch from coal to gas appears unlikely, regardless of the pricing rule adopted
      • Under the EU ETS, long-term substitutions between coal-fired units and CCGT plants will take place under very restrictive conditions
  • APPENDIX
    • Ask the analyst
    • Datamonitor consulting
    • Disclaimer
  • List of Figures
    • Figure 1: The 60-day rolling correlation between gas and EU Allowance (EUA) prices has a long-term mostly positive upward trend
    • Figure 2: The 60-day rolling correlation between Brent spot and EUA spot returns has a long-term upward trend and is largely positive
    • Figure 3: Global cap and trade mechanisms will lead to higher carbon prices as the demand side scenario prevails
    • Figure 4: Without carbon pricing, thermal plant breakeven varies with overall energy demand
    • Figure 5: Theoretical plant commercial breakeven is driven down by (cap and trade) carbon pricing
    • Figure 6: The divergence in ' 07 and ' 08 EUA prices has increased the potential and scale of windfall profits in the power sector
    • Figure 7: The threshold carbon price varies depending on the decision rules adopted by power utilities
    • Figure 8: When considering a switch, pricing and decision rules must first be considered
    • Figure 9: Currently, EUA prices appear to be well below all of the power generation switching threshold scenarios

ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ | °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸º¸È£Á¤Ã¥ | ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü | ¹è¼Û/°áÁ¦¾È³» | ÀÌ¿ë¾È³»

¼­¿ï½Ã °­³²±¸ ³íÇöµ¿ 210-1 »ï¿øºôµù | ȸ»ç¸í : (ÁÖ)¿¤¾Ø¿¡Ä¡
´ëÇ¥ÀüÈ­ : 02-554-0001 / Æѽº : 02-3444-5501 / À̸ÞÀÏ : sales@landh.co.kr
Copyright ¨Ï 2008 LNH, Inc. All rights reserved.