|
Table of Contents
1. INTRODUCTION
2. TYPES OF ELECTROACTIVE POLYMERS (EAP)
2.1. Electric
2.1.1. Dielectric Elastomers
2.1.2. Ferroelelectric
2.1.3. Liquid Crystal Elastomers (LCE)
2.1.4. Electrostrictive Graft Elastomers
2.1.5. Electro-viscoelastic Elastomers
2.2. Ionic
2.2.1. Conductive Polymers
2.2.2. CNT Actuators
2.2.3. Ionic Polymer-Metal Composites
3. CHARACTERIZATION AND COMPARISON
3.1. Electroactive paper
4. APPLICATIONS
5. ACTUATORS
5.1. Haptics
5.2. Braille Display
5.3. Speakers
5.3.1. Fibre Speakers
5.4. Sensors
5.4.1. Screen Printed Piezoelectric Sensors
5.5. Medical / Artificial Muscles
6. ENERGY HARVESTING
7. INTERVIEWS
7.1. Arkema / Piezotech
7.2. Bayer MaterialSciences LLC / Artificial Muscle (AMI)
7.3. Danfoss PolyPower A/S
7.4. Optotune
7.5. Solvay Specialty Polymers
7.6. Strategic Polymers, Inc. (SPS)
7.7. SynapTech
8. SUPPLIER & COMPANY PROFILES
8.1. Airmar Technology
8.2. Biomimetics Laboratory
8.3. CFS Medical
8.4. CTSystems
8.5. Dow Corning
8.6. EAMEX Corporation
8.7. EMPA
8.8. Environmental Robots Inc (ERI)
8.9. ITRI
8.10. MCNC
8.11. Meggitt Sensing Systems
8.12. Creganna
8.13. Philips Research
8.14. pmTUC - Institute of Print and Media Technology at Chemnitz University of Technology
8.15. Raytheon
8.16. SBM Offshore
8.17. Santa Fe Science and Technology
8.18. TEEC
8.19. University of Tokyo
9. FORECASTS 2013-2018
9.1. Actuators
9.2. Sensors
9.3. Consumer Electronics
9.4. Medical Applications
9.5. Braille Display
9.6. Energy Harvesting
9.7. Aerospace Applications
9.8. Market size by application
APPENDIX 1: IDTECHEX PUBLICATIONS AND CONSULTANCY
TABLES
2.1. List of main electro active polymers (EAP)
2.2. Dielectric Elastomers, Advantages vs. Disadvantages
2.3. Ferroelectric Polymers, Advantages vs. Disadvantages
2.4. Advantages vs. Disadvantages
2.5. Electrostrictive Graft Polymers, Advantages vs. Disadvantages
2.6. Electro-viscoelastic Elastomers, Advantages vs. Disadvantages
2.7. CP Actuators, Advantages vs. Disadvantages
2.8. CNT actuators, Advantages vs. Disadvantages
2.9. IPMC actuators, Advantages vs. Disadvantages
3.1. Comparison of EAPs with electroactive ceramics and shape memory alloys
3.2. Advantages and Disadvantages of Electronic vs. Ionic EAP
3.3. Matrix, Electronic vs. Ionic EAP
5.1. Classification of Actuators by Actuation Mechanism
5.2. Market players in Printed Piezo-electric sensors
7.1. Configurations of PolyPower DEAP material
7.2. Properties of back to back laminated film
8.1. EAMEX portfolio comparison
9.1. EAP for Actuators*, in millions of units and total revenue (US$ million) 2013-2018
9.2. EAP for Sensors*, in millions of units and total revenue (US$ million) 2013-2018
9.3. EAP for Sensors (large area), in millions of units and total revenue (US$ million) 2013-2018
9.4. EAP for Consumer Electronics, in million of units and total revenue (US$ million) 2013-2018
9.5. EAP for Medical Applications, in million of units and total revenue (US$ million) 2013-2018
9.6. EAP for Energy Harvesting, in million of units and total revenue (US$ million) 2013-2018
9.7. Revenue (US$ million) by application 2013-2018
9.8. Units (US$ million) by application 2013-2018
FIGURES
2.1. Dielectrical elastomers from Danfoss PolyPower A/S
3.1. Self powered piezoelectric sensors are developed by the Center for Energy Harvesting Materials and Systems at VirginiaTech
5.1. Competitive tactile technologies
5.2. A haptic touch screen shown by Visteon at the Consumer Electronics Show in January 2010 shows an automotive 'infotainment' panel demonstrating the implementation of an 8-in. multifunction touch screen as part of an integrated cont
5.3. A refreshable Braille display developed at Sungkyunkwan University, South Korea, uses dielectric elastomer EAP with bubble shape dots. The prototype is shown being tested by a blind person in an overall view and a close up on the
5.4. Seoul National University Acoustic PVDF actuator consists of a graphene-based transducer connected to the sound source and amplifier
5.5. Paper-based flexible PVDF and PEDOT:PSS speaker from pmTUC
5.6. Paper-based FleXpeaker from ITRI
5.7. Fabric that can interact with its environment
5.8. Touchless interface with Electrochromic display: developed together with Joanneum Research, Fraunhofer ISC, Acreo, Johannes Kepler University Linz, 3PLAST Fig.
5.9. Piezoelectric Sensor Device (Meas Spec DT Series)
5.10. Synap Tech's articulating neural interfaces
6.1. The EAP context in which the piezoelectric energy harvesters can be applied
7.1. Headphones using ViviTouch(R)
7.2. PolyPower DEAP material
7.3. Touchless interface with Electrochromic display: developed together with Joanneum Research, Fraunhofer ISC, Acreo, Johannes Kepler University Linz, 3PLAST
7.4. Actuator developed with Fraunhofer IOF
7.5. Strategic Polymer Stress-Strain-Comparison
7.6. Strategic Polymer Raodmap
7.7. SynapTech's articulating neural interfaces
8.1. EAP based hand
8.2. Examples of EMPA EAP activities
8.3. ERI EAP actuator relaxed and deformed
8.4. ITRI EAP FleXpeaker, 2009
8.5. Installation at Taipei Expo Park, 2011
8.6. Artificial eyelid from MCNC
8.7. Example of motion sensor printed on paper
8.8. Panion CP EAP
9.1. Market share by application in 2018
9.2. Revenue (US$ million)by application 2013-2018
9.3. Units (US$ million) by application 2013-2018
|
현재위치 : 
